A lot of money is spent repairing old buildings. Instead of repairing these buildings, they should be knocked down and replaced with new ones. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a prevailing belief that
instead
of repairing old buildings
, they should be demolished and replaced by new ones. While
I concur that old buildings
should be knocked down and replaced, those with longer historical lengths should be kept and restored for further
educational purposes.
On the one hand, remaining old buildings
could disrupt the modern outlay of an area. Some buildings
dated long ago were built in an outdated style that neither translates to the contemporary architectural preferences of modern citizens nor gives off the urban aesthetic provided by more modern buildings
. For instance
, having a cottage in the centre of a city does not integrate with the modern, minimalistic skyscrapers nearby. Besides
, old buildings
, even when repaired, do not sustain as high a level of safety as new ones, requiring cyclic restoration. Maintaining an old building thus
is much more expensive than erecting a whole new one.
That said, the necessity of removing old-fashioned buildings
is not absolute. Historical buildings
, like castles or churches, hold great educational and touristic potential. In other words
, keeping them not only provides evidence for history learners but also
allows for greater occupational opportunities and contributes to the nation’s economic growth. To illustrate, by sustaining villages, a Japanese region has attracted both students coming to learn and tourists visiting, facilitating the local employment and economy.
In conclusion, whilst knocking down old buildings
can better the municipal appearance, some buildings
with high existing age should be maintained since it benefits society and empowers a more immersive learning experience.Submitted by tranbaongoc231007 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
When discussing complex issues, ensure each paragraph has a clear central topic and that all sentences within that paragraph support that topic. Some concepts in your essay, while pertinent, seemed a bit disparate and could have been better connected to the central argument.
coherence cohesion
Be vigilant with your essay structure. Your introduction and conclusion were present and functional, but could be improved for clearer articulation of your thesis and summary of your arguments. Aim for succinct, yet comprehensive introductions and conclusions.
coherence cohesion
Strengthen your arguments by making sure each is clearly linked to the question prompt and is expanded with ample support. You have used relevant examples, although additional details or specific evidence could enhance their impact.
task achievement
To fully address the task, it's important to cover all parts of the prompt thoroughly. While you have provided arguments for both sides, make sure you delve deeply into the reasons for your positions and the implications thereof.
task achievement
Ensure that your ideas are not only clear but also comprehensive. While your essay demonstrates understanding, further elaboration on key points would showcase a more thorough command of the topic.
task achievement
While you used relevant examples, incorporating a broader range of specific instances or data could have substantiated your claims more effectively. Aim to provide specific evidence to back up each assertion you make.