Many believe that the government should not allocate their nation's wealth to artistic projects, since painting and music do not directly contribute to the citizens' quality development. I personally agree with
this
statement. In Linking Words
this
essay, I will discuss Linking Words
further
two reasons behind my opinion.
Linking Words
Firstly
, an investment Linking Words
Change preposition
in
on
people's basic needs Change preposition
in
Correct subject-verb agreement
has
have
more urgency compared to the development of arts. Museums and artistic goods are beautiful and great for a state's icons. Correct subject-verb agreement
has
However
, they will bring none to little impact Linking Words
to
the well-being of a country's inhabitants. Change preposition
on
For example
, plenty of creative exhibitions were held in Paris, Linking Words
while
the rate of criminality there continued to increase every year. It is too pathetic to think of a beautiful city when the people living there did not gain an adequate sense of safety and security.
Linking Words
Secondly
, not everyone in a region is wealthy enough to enjoy the experiences of watching breathtaking drama theatres and strolling around world-class museums since they Linking Words
oftenly
require a large amount of cash. Correct your spelling
often
For instance
, the majority of artistic public sites in Eastern Europe are far from affordable. Linking Words
As a result
, those public facilities are only accessible Linking Words
for
high-income families. Change preposition
to
Furthermore
, they will later create a wider gap Linking Words
of
opportunities between privileged and unprivileged residents.
In conclusion, the president and ministries should not spend too much money on musical performances and art exhibitions since they are most likely to bring positive Change preposition
in
affects
for rich people only. Correct your spelling
effects
Instead
, they can direct the cash to improve the basic living needs of their citizens.Linking Words
jelitasofiaz