A country’s future depends on its young people. Therefore, a country should invest heavily in its youth. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the future, the country’s growth will depend on all young citizens.

Therefore

, the government should invest since they are still young. I partially agree with these statements.

Hence

, I would like to discuss

this

issue and counter

this

attack.

Firstly

, the majority of the national budget should be separated into the education system within the citizens from the elementary level to the university level.

For example

, Finland

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

is the best education in the world, the teacher will get a higher salary to develop the student

according to

the arbitrary ability in their classroom.

Otherwise

, the population will lack the power and knowledge to develop their local.

In addition

, the authority should support the knowledge centre for all children despite spending a lot of money because they can find a way of professional life in the future.

Moreover

, without the direct investment of the government in the youths, rearing by the guardians has been the key to the manner of humans.

As a result

, the politician should consider both the policy and the benefit when the family give birth new population.

For instance

, in Europe, the tax on the merchandise for looking after the baby will be reduced.

Nevertheless

, the people will mutually construct a security society for all individuals

although

they spend time building that. Eventually, national growth will

also

depend on the safety living of in the crown.

To conclude

, not only properly separating the budget the children has played a crucial role in becoming good labourers but

also

constructing a better society has been associated with being a developed country.