Some people believe that professional workers such as doctors and teachers should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is an ongoing debate regarding whether professionals,
such
as doctors and teachers, should receive higher compensation compared to
athletes
and
entertainers
. I strongly disagree with
this
argument as I believe that an individual's earnings should be based on their
market
value
and the scarcity of their
talent
and skills.
Market
value
should be the determining factor for compensation, and when considering
market
value
, it becomes apparent that
athletes
and
entertainers
have a significant advantage. Unlike doctors and teachers, whose influence is limited to their patients or students, sportsmen and
entertainers
can reach a global audience through various media and events.
This
can be best illustrated by the pop star Taylor Swift, whose music videos have been viewed billions of times on YouTube. The widespread interest and viewership that
entertainers
and
athletes
generate attract sponsors and advertisers, ultimately leading to substantial revenue generation.
Thus
, it is only fair that
athletes
and
entertainers
are rewarded more
due to
their global reach.
Moreover
, the rarity of exceptional
talent
in sports and entertainment sets these professionals apart from others.
While
many individuals can pursue careers in fields like medicine or engineering through hard work, there are only a few who possess extraordinary abilities in sports or entertainment.
For example
, there may be numerous aspiring musicians, but only a handful
such
as Taylor Swift, can consistently produce music that deeply resonates with people.
Similarly
, the extraordinary achievements of
athletes
such
as Michael Phelps are extremely rare. The rarity of
such
talent
increases their
market
value
and justifies higher compensation. In conclusion, it is entirely reasonable that
athletes
and
entertainers
are paid more than professionals in other industries
due to
their high
market
value
and the scarcity of their exceptional
talent
Submitted by kikinaeli97 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Make sure to directly address the essay question in both the introduction and the conclusion to solidify your position on the matter.
task achievement
Expand on your examples by providing more detail and explanation to strengthen your argument and illustrating your points more effectively.
coherence and cohesion
To improve logical flow, consider using a wider range of cohesive devices and paragraph transitions to enhance the reader's understanding of the progression of your argument.
coherence and cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea, and all subsequent sentences in that paragraph relate directly back to that central idea for improved cohesion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Professional workers
  • Societal contribution
  • Scarcity
  • Market forces
  • Consumer demand
  • Role models
  • Economic impact
  • Revenue generation
  • Fair compensation
  • Social equity
  • Intrinsic rewards
  • Job satisfaction
  • Media rights
  • Merchandise sales
  • Public figures
What to do next:
Look at other essays: