The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree of disagree with this statement?
In contemporary society, scientific research has consistently been a topic of interest among the masses. The statement - Improving
humanity
's lives is the central goal of scientific development presents a viewpoint that is
both thought-provoking and debatable. Despite its contentious nature, I am inclined to oppose this
perspective, as I believe societies should make environmental problems a priority and furthermore
, this
is the main problem that scientists need to dedicate to solving.
There is little doubt that scientific research plays an important role in the fast-changing world. Inventions from small scales such
as microwaves to large scales like high-speed rails or even intangible open AI -ChatGPT did bring infinite convenience to human life. In the near future, robots can replace most of the job positions which are boring and repeating. Due to
unstopping research and scientists understanding the world more, people
's lives become incredibly comfortable. It is therefore
reasonable that science
is without doubt improving and bringing convenience to humanity
's community.
However
, the aforementioned perspectives overlook the environment as the only decisive reason that decides how long people
can live. If people
keep ignoring the alerts from the earth, human extinction is only a matter of time. Therefore
, I believe, the development of science
should aim at solving the extreme global environmental disaster. To elaborate, numerous farms are facing the situation - disappearing of bees. Bees help plants in the process of pollination and thus
are necessary to most flowers and fruit-producing trees. Without bees, humanity
would be dead within a year or less. Therefore
, it is crucial that scientists find effective ways to solve the disaster. Such
an instance challenges the initial assertion and supports my opinion that decreasing concerns and the phenomenon of global warming is more important than improving people
's lives, otherwise
, the whole societies of humanity
will die out soon.
In conclusion, reflecting upon the statement science
is focused on advancing people
's life standards is not black or white. But it is crucial to acknowledge the earth is the treasure that whole communities should put in the first place. Given the consideration, my allegiance that the goal of science
's improvement is to prolong the deterioration of the earth's environment is steadfastly consolidated and remains incontrovertibly firm.Submitted by jasmine2001tw on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Make sure to have a clear position throughout the essay. While you address the prompt, a more nuanced development of your stance with a balanced consideration of both views would improve clarity and task response. Addressing the other side of the argument briefly can add to the depth of your analysis.
coherence cohesion
Consider organizing your essay into clear, distinct paragraphs that each focus on a single main idea. Use a wider range of cohesive devices to improve the logical flow of ideas from one sentence to another and from one paragraph to the next.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are present and generally appropriate, but they could be stronger with a more decisive thesis statement and a more concise summary of the key points discussed within the essay. Ensure the conclusion fully encapsulates your overall argument.
coherence cohesion
Utilize a wider range of vocabulary and grammatical structures. While the essay includes some complex sentence structures and vocabulary, there is room for greater linguistic range which can contribute to a higher band score. Avoid repetition of certain words and phrases to make your writing more varied.
task achievement
Support your main points with a broader range of examples and evidence that clearly relate to the prompt. While some examples are present, they could be more fully developed and directly linked to the central topic of how science should prioritize its aims.