In recent years, there has been a tremendous increase in the number of people questioning whether cities should legalize
the Correct article usage
show examples
graffiti
art and open spaces for them. On the one hand, there are those who argue that
this
will serve
a Change preposition
show examples
medium for self-representation and creativity.
However
, critics, including myself, strongly oppose
this
view and
instead
believe that
this
will significantly increase the vandalism of public properties.
To begin
, there is an argument to be made that
graffiti
grants
artists
the opportunity to reveal their skills and the value of their work to the public.
For example
, in the UK, many
graffiti
artists
tend to draw at night on the walls of streets
while
covering their faces, just to show the public the beauty of
this
art and reflect on their emotions.
For
this
reason, it is evident that
graffiti
is not only drawing different paintings on walls
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
also
a chance for youths to express their needs in an innovative way. What is more, it
also
motivateChange the verb form
show examples
youths to think
and in wide dimensions, which inevitably supports the
overall
appreciation of
this
art in society.
This
being the case, it can be assumed that if cities allowed
graffiti
in certain places,
this
would encourage many
artists
to represent their
and thinking freely.
Nonetheless
, it must be stated that there might be an
increase in vandalism cases especially around
mostCorrect article usage
show examples
popular areas.
For instance
, one-third of
graffiti
artists
in Poland undergo police investigation annually
due to
vandalizing bank, government and commercial properties.
Therefore
, it is evident that the government should not allow
this
kind of behaviour, simply because some people might abuse
this
chance to destroy the aesthetic of buildings around the city.
Furthermore
, some of the paintings are age-sensitive and are not supposed to be in public, which negatively
impactChange the verb form
show examples
children’s behaviours
as a result
. With
this
in mind, there is no doubt that if
graffiti
was allowed in cities,
this
would
cause an
overall
disruption to the public.
To conclude
,
While
some may feel that
graffiti
should be permitted to help
artists
clearly share their
, others, myself included, hold the view that it should be banned and regulated by the government to prevent any harmful consequences.
From my perspective, not only will
graffiti
postCorrect your spelling
show examples
a threat to public buildings, but
also
it might cause
Correct article usage
show examples
in theft cases, simply because
this
will drive outrageous behaviours possible by certain
groups.