Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
The assertion that making sugary
products
more expensive is the solution to mitigating health
problems associated with high sugar
consumption warrants careful consideration. While
it is undeniable that excessive sugar
intake contributes to various health
issues, imposing higher prices on sugary products
may not be the most effective or equitable approach
. This
essay explores the reasons to disagree with the notion of making sugary products
more expensive and proposes alternative strategies to promote healthier dietary choices
.
Firstly
, the argument for increasing the cost of sugary products
assumes that consumers
have complete control over their purchasing decisions. In reality, socio-economic factors play a significant role in shaping dietary choices
. Making sugary products
more expensive could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, potentially exacerbating existing health
disparities. This
regressive impact raises ethical concerns about the fairness of such
a measure.
Moreover
, a sugar
tax may not address the root causes of excessive sugar
consumption. Rather than relying solely on financial disincentives, a more comprehensive approach
involves promoting nutritional education and fostering a greater understanding of the health
implications of excessive sugar
intake. By empowering individuals with knowledge, they can make informed
choices
about their diets, leading to healthier habits without resorting to punitive measures.
Furthermore
, there is a risk that a sugar
tax might inadvertently lead to the substitution of sugary products
with other, potentially unhealthy alternatives. In an effort to avoid higher prices, consumers
might turn to cheaper but equally unhealthy options, defeating the purpose of the tax and contributing to the persistence of health
issues related to poor dietary choices
.
A more effective strategy involves collaboration between the government, food industry, and healthcare providers to implement comprehensive public health
initiatives. These initiatives can include promoting healthier product formulations, improving nutritional labeling
, and investing in educational campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of balanced diets. By fostering a holistic Change the spelling
labelling
approach
that addresses both supply and demand factors, the focus shifts from penalizing consumers
to creating an environment conducive to
healthier choices
.
In conclusion, while
the health
problems associated with high sugar
consumption are undeniable, making sugary products
more expensive is not the ideal solution. This
approach
risks disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, may not address the root causes of unhealthy dietary choices
, and could lead to unintended consequences. A more effective strategy involves a multifaceted approach
that combines nutritional education, industry collaboration, and public health
initiatives to encourage healthier lifestyles without imposing financial burdens on consumers
.Submitted by bahram.azizzade on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this siteβs author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that your essay has a clear and logical structure, with distinct paragraphs that each address a single main point. Consider using a more transparent progression of ideas throughout the essay to guide the reader clearly from one point to the next.
coherence cohesion
Include a clear introduction and conclusion in the essay to frame your arguments effectively. Your conclusion should reiterate the main points discussed in the essay and provide a final perspective on the issue.
coherence cohesion
When supporting main points, use more specific and detailed examples to illustrate your arguments. This can enhance the persuasive power of your essay and demonstrate a higher level of understanding of the topic.
task achievement
Ensure that the essay fully addresses all parts of the task. Expand your response to cover all aspects of the prompt, including potential counterarguments and a more balanced view where necessary.
task achievement
Articulate your ideas clearly and comprehensively. Work on developing each point with sufficient detail and depth of analysis to provide a thorough understanding of your perspective.
task achievement
Integrate more relevant and specific examples to substantiate your claims. Demonstrating real-world applications or citing evidence can greatly enhance the task achievement score.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.