Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion

Many individuals
of
Add a missing verb
are of
show examples
the opinion that cities should permit
for
Change preposition
apply
show examples
spaces
for
graffiti
while
others argue that it should be prohibited.
This
essay will discuss both perspectives,
along with
presenting my opinion. On the one hand,
graffiti
is a form of self-expression and art. Cities providing several areas for
graffiti
can nurture creativity.
This
might cause
magnificant
Correct your spelling
significant
art works
Correct your spelling
artworks
show examples
and bring
color
Change the spelling
colour
show examples
and vibrancy to urban
spaces
.
Moreover
, these urban
spaces
might become
tourist
attractions.
As a result
,
welfare
Correct article usage
the welfare
show examples
level of the city may experience a rise and the
tourist
revenues might increase.
For example
, in France, there is a famous
graffiti
artist named Banksy whose artwork has become one of the most famous
tourist
attractions in the entire country. I totally agree with
this
side, in my point of view, not only government should allow it,
it
Correct word choice
but it
show examples
should support
graffiti
artists too.
On the other hand
, supporters of the other side claim that there are several causes of why it should be banned,
firstly
, not all
graffiti
is considered
as
Change preposition
apply
show examples
art, in fact, most of it is painted randomly.
Thus
, it can affect the general view of towns,
additionally
, individuals who do that are mostly careless about what they leave behind after they
finished
Wrong verb form
finish
show examples
drawing.
As a result
, the image of neighbourhoods can be ruined.
Furthermore
, criminal gangs usually use
this
type of paint to communicate with their gang members or their enemies,
hence
, by allowing that, the government could be helping criminal activities and the crime level of the city might increase.
To conclude
, allowing
spaces
for
graffiti
might nurture
creativity
Correct article usage
the creativity
show examples
level of the artists and
therefore
these places might become
tourist
attractions. But
also
it might cause a disturbing view in towns and help criminal gangs in different ways. Personally, I believe if
this
is allowed under limited circumstances, negative aspects can be solved and it can be beneficial for cities.
Submitted by edzcls on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
You provided a clear introduction and conclusion, which set out the essay structure effectively. However, you could improve your essay by ensuring that each paragraph has a clear central theme and that all sentences within those paragraphs are clearly linked to that theme.
task achievement
In terms of task response, you have addressed the prompt by discussing both views and providing your opinion. Nevertheless, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven, and your essay would benefit from more equitable treatment of both views and a more explicit statement of your personal stance towards the end. Make sure to fully elaborate on how the negative aspects can be resolved as part of your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban art
  • vandalism
  • vibrancy
  • aesthetic
  • decline
  • creative expression
  • cultural asset
  • legal ramifications
  • marginalized groups
  • community engagement
  • ethical considerations
  • gentrification
  • zoning regulations
  • public space
  • civic responsibility
  • curated walls
  • street artists
  • social commentary
  • property rights
  • anti-graffiti coatings
What to do next:
Look at other essays: