Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

When it comes to the right of

university

education

accessibility, there is a

hot-potato

Correct your spelling

hot potato

show examples

debate over whether the government should remove fees for all sorts of

students

or not. Despite the supporting argument, I am inclined to disagree with

this

statement, as

this

action leads to a series of negative implications. On one hand, it is undeniable that some particular groups of pupils should receive financial assistance to get to

university

. The primary reason for

this

is to provide

students

with equal opportunities so that even lower-income households would be able to send their children to

university

.

For instance

, Texas

University

provides gifted

students

with full-ride scholarships that can encourage them to fully devote themselves to the pursuit of knowledge without fearing burdened tuition fees.

Additionally

,

this

policy is a potential precursor for a highly educated population. Thanks to universalized tertiary

education

, a greater number of people can become academic experts, enhancing the intellectual level of the whole society.

On the other hand

, there would be a new financial burden for the public.

While

our resources are severely limited

but

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

the demand that has to be satisfied is very high,

Correct word choice

and universities

show examples

universities

Correct word choice

and universities

show examples

require additional funding to teach a wider range of

students

, which may have negative consequences. Taxpayers would be disaffected if their hard-earned money was used to support groups of people whose material contribution to society was deemed nebulous. Take the California State

University

(CSU) System as an example, when it received significant funding increases to expand student enrollment and improve graduation rates in 2015;

however

, reports emerged of overcrowded classrooms, limited student support services, and faculty shortages, leading to concerns about the quality of

education

.

Besides

, larger class sizes

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

slashed funding for essential services, and compromised academic freedom—

these

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

are the potential downsides of universities chasing increased funding to open their doors wider. In conclusion, I believe

university

education

should not be free for all. As well-meaning as

this

course of action may sound, it would be an inefficient use of resources and not without risks.