Some believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Due to
globalization, people have more choices of places to work
after finishing higher education or training. Especially, universal professionals such
as doctors, engineers, or pharmacists have more freedom of choice where to work
. Therefore
, debates on whether their freedom of choice should be respected or not are continuing these days.
Some points of view on this
issue contend that professionals should contribute to nations where they finished their training. The main reason for them pushing this
argument is because training programmes are different by country. For instance
, in the US, it takes 6 years to get a degree in Pharmacy whereas
it only takes 4 years in South Korea. This
gap in training between the two countries
could potentially cause issues after starting a career as a pharmacist. Hence
, it is appropriate to work
in the country where they get trained.
On the other hand
, others assert that their will to work
in other countries
should be respected. There are various reasons for moving abroad to start their job, such
as a higher salary, better living conditions, or better opportunities for their specific career. Countries
do not have the right to ban them from pursuing the life they want. Moreover
, professional trainings are not usually offered by countries
, but paid for by trainees. Thus
, their choice of future solely lies to themselves.
To sum up
, some insist that candidates should be required to stay in the country where they finished their training since problems could be encountered after starting a career due to
the difference between training programmes. Nonetheless
, others proclaim that their freedom to choose their future should be respected. I assert that future professionals should have a wide variety to choose where to stack up their occupations.Submitted by yelim050319 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
To improve coherence, use a wider range of cohesive devices to link ideas more naturally.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction should provide a clearer outline of the essay structure to guide the reader.
coherence cohesion
Try to develop your main points more fully with specific examples or evidence for stronger support.
task achievement
Ensure that you address all parts of the task by discussing both views thoroughly and stating your opinion clearly.
task achievement
To better address task achievement criteria, make your ideas more comprehensive by expanding on them and providing depth in your argument.
task achievement
Incorporate specific examples or case studies to support your arguments and make them more convincing.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!