Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc.to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There has been an intriguing debate between those who believe younger generations should pursue

university

and others who argue practical education may be the best solution for a better society. Even though both sides have their concerns that affect their opinion, I believe the

university

path offers a greater

chance

for students to discover their life purpose. Allowing teenagers to continue higher education will give them a wider opportunity to explore their career choices. Not only

they

Add a missing verb

do they

show examples

get to master a specific field, but it will

also

provide them with the

chance

to connect with like-minded people and build a community

while

doing it.

Hence

,

college

Add an article

the college

show examples

serves as a catalyst for their professional growth before entering the real world, preparing them for a competitive job market.

For instance

, a student who is passionate about entrepreneurship would have the privilege of being exposed to an experienced businessman which happened to be an alumnus of the same major. Considering their similar backgrounds, it would be much easier for him to learn from his experiences

while

maintaining a relationship with him at the same time. I see

this

as an investment for a better life, so, college

Correct your spelling

tuition

tuitions

tutitions

Correct your spelling

tuition

is a small price to pay

However

, there are other options for some students.

This

phenomenon happened mainly

due to

the lack of financial stability.

Moreover

, pressure from family members to work as soon as possible eventually ruled them out of

university

experiences. In light of

this

issue, practical training offers the

chance

to learn profitable specialized skills that seize up their career opportunity. By choosing the latter, they can make use of their learning experience faster than

university

graduates without heavy implications on their financial ability. Unfortunately, selecting

this

path means lessening their

chance

to create a greater change career-wise because the environment does not support quality networking. In conclusion, both opinions are adequate since every situation requires different approaches. Either of them serves ample opportunities;

therefore

, the best decision relies on individual wants and needs. If it were me, a higher education level would be a priority as it includes better networking opportunities.