The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant.

The given line chart illustrates how much automobile was stolen in four different

countries

Use synonyms

from 1990 to 1999. Units are measured in thievery per thousand vehicles.

Overall

Linking Words

, it can clearly be seen that all of the

countries

Use synonyms

started at approximately the same amount of

number

Use synonyms

, with the exception of Great

Britain

Use synonyms

.

Moreover

Linking Words

, Great

Britain

Use synonyms

had the highest figure of thefts over the year. In terms of the two

countries

Use synonyms

with the highest

rate

Use synonyms

of thefts, the

figure

Fix the agreement mistake

figures

show examples

for Great

Britain

Use synonyms

and Sweden stood at around 18 and about 9, respectively. The

rate

Use synonyms

of

Change preposition

in

show examples

Great

Britain

Use synonyms

then

Linking Words

rose gradually to exactly 20 between 1990 and 1993.

Subsequently

Linking Words

, it fluctuated noticeably before undergoing a steady drop and hitting the trough by the same

number

Use synonyms

as the starting point in the final year.

In contrast

Linking Words

, the

number

Use synonyms

of Sweden increased drastically with small fluctuations and peaked at almost 15, just under Great

Britain

Use synonyms

, in the same period. Regarding the other two

countries

Use synonyms

with the lower

number

Use synonyms

of thefts, the figure for France and Canada started at just above 5 and around 8, successively. The

rate

Use synonyms

of France

then

Linking Words

fluctuated very slightly between 5 and 8 in the following nine years.

Likewise

Linking Words

, the

rate

Use synonyms

of Canada experienced quite the same movement.

As a result

Linking Words

, both end up on the same level.