Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinion is divided on whether animal testing should be utilized to facilitate medical improvements of humankind or restricted as these experiments are inhumane.
Although
animal experiments benefit numerous fields, I am apprehensive about this
situation.
Supporters of texting in animals
argue that these living creatures play an indispensable part in discovering new medicines. This
is because animals
such
as rabbits, monkeys, or rodents possess nearly identical DNA and organs, which helps to reduce the steps involving employing voluntary participants to test the latest medicines. This
point may be valid, but since technological advances have been integrated into medical testing, scientists can use small pieces of tissue or human cells to analyze the efficiency of new drugs with pinpoint accuracy. Additionally
, animal testing always raises concerns about reliable results since these creatures are far from the biological characteristics of humans
, resulting in more than 95% of novel drugs failing to be applied to humans
, according to
the latest research.
Experimenting on animals
to benefit humankind raises a question about ethics and morals. It must be acknowledged that all living creatures, without an expectation for testing animals
, are sentient. In other words
, if a chemical or substance is dangerous for humans
, it should not be tested on animals
since both can not handle pain and intense suffering. However
, some may argue that such
animals
are wired to be submissive and are inferior to humans
. This
may be true to some extent. However
, countless canine companions, offering a hand to the day-to-day life of the disabled, have eliminated this
gap between humans
and animals
, bringing a deeper insight into the appreciation and respect these animals
deserve.
In conclusion, testing on animals
can surely enhance people’s quality of life since it boosts the productivity of producing new medicines, but state-of-the-art medical improvement, unreliability of the results, and ethical concerns can negate the aformentioned
benefits.Correct your spelling
aforementioned
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Aim to fully develop your main ideas by expanding on the reasoning or providing clear, specific examples that strengthen the points made.
coherence cohesion
Clarify transitions between different sections and ideas for a smoother flow and to enhance logical structuring throughout the essay.
coherence cohesion
Ensure consistency in terminology and phrasing to maintain coherence throughout the essay.
coherence cohesion
Consider refining your introduction and conclusion to present a stronger and clearer thesis statement and summarization of your viewpoints, respectively.
task achievement
Incorporate a wider range of example types to further illustrate your arguments, including statistics, case studies, anecdotes, or hypothetical scenarios.