Some people will believe that robots will replace classroom teacher in the future. To what extend do you agree or disagree

A great number of the population find it believable that

teachers

will be replaced by

robots

in the future. I ultimately disagree with

this

statement.

Firstly

, one of the main reasons that

teachers

will never be replaced by

robots

is not just because of the importance of the experiences, but because of empathy. In teaching prospect, theoretical knowledge alone is not the only aspect that needs to be taught but the

overall

sense of morality can

therefore

result in a significantly positive upbringing.

For example

, in Thailand,

such

students who were taught by

teachers

may find it simple to instantly help others when their problems arise.

Additionally

, each teacher has a unique background which can noticeably affect their teaching styles.

Hence

, students will absorb both theoretical knowledge and morality sense in a unique way.

Secondly

, the disparity between humanity and

robots

is emotional

such

as sadness, anger or happiness. The majority of

teachers

tend to express themselves

while

providing students with knowledge,

in particular

.

For instance

,

teachers

may angry at those who don’t pay attention to class,

although

it’s a negative expression, it’s can

otherwise

improve the connection between them.

In addition

, learners will encounter a situation that would take dedication and empathy in order to understand

teachers

’ struggles.

Consequently

, they will achieve an appropriate manner that will grant them a path to society.

To conclude

,

teachers

will not be replaced by

robots

in the future.

Robots

cannot practice as

teachers

, in my view, the imperfections of humanity allow them to perfectly fit the role of being a teacher.