Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g. cost, environments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is undeniable that the government should play a prominent role in order to make people's lives much easier. Some population think that the administration should spend money on public transport.
While
others believe that there are more alternatives
such
as cost situations and environmental improvements. Personally, I am partially in favour of the
last
view. A convincing argument can be made that there are significant issues which have to be controlled more than developing transit utilities, like increasing salaries and enhancing environmental quality. The fundamental reason for
this
is most of the jobs depend on online services and online meetings so they don't have to use public transit.
Besides
, nowadays, an enormous number of communities tend to live in urban central
instead
of the countryside which makes every single spot near to each other.
For instance
, In Kuwait, the main zone of business and jobs are in the downtown, and the community are walking physically from their own homes to the offices and the restaurants.
Second,
research has found that the countries that used to spend money on population priorities mostly have better lifestyles and more creativity.
This
is because if the government provide the right environment and more facilities and utilities, everyone will be able to break their limits or push their limits.
furthermore
, if the government has controlled the financial inflation and decreased the cost of society's basic life, ultimately, they will be happy. In conclusion, public transport might considered as one of the issues which face society nowadays. But other priorities
such
as cost and environment have more bad affection than transportation. As I mentioned in the previous paragraph above, I think transportation should wait until other facilities have been completed.
Submitted by khaleefalkhalaf on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Structural advice
Ensure that your essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. In the introduction, present both sides of the argument and state your own opinion. In the body, dedicate one paragraph to discussing each view and support your points with specific examples. Then, wrap up your arguments in a concise conclusion that summarizes your viewpoint
Cohesion advice
Improve the logical flow of your essay by using cohesive devices such as linking words and phrases to connect ideas. Be careful not to overuse them and always strive for a natural progression of thought
Task Response advice
In depth coverage of both views is necessary for a balanced discussion. Be sure to address the arguments for and against faster public transport comprehensively, providing specific examples and reasons for each perspective. Also, explain why you prefer one view over the other with clear justification and illustration
What to do next:
Look at other essays: