Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of how developing
countries
should assist the underestimated ones is a matter of ongoing debate. Personally, I agree with this
sentiment.
To begin
with, money by itself is meaningless, but it can contribute to enhancing the poverty situation of poorer countries
. Developing countries
should provide monetary aid in areas like education, health, and infrastructure development. This
approach could lead to the growth and thriving of the economy in poorer countries
. For instance
, when a government invests in funding an outreach area by building a factory, such
an investment allows the people in that area to work for their livelihoods, which, in turn, could boost the entire region and have a positive impact on the overall
economy of the country
.
Moreover
, while
the role of financial assistance cannot be denied, it is often hindered by issues such
as corruption, mismanagement, and dependency. Therefore
, different types of assistance should be considered. For example
, a wealthy country
like America could offer to build hospitals or schools in rural areas of a poorer country
like India. This
would improve the entire community in those areas.
In conclusion, while
the power of money is crucial for a country
’s development, other forms of aid are equally important for community infrastructure. It is clear that
mitigating poverty status in any country
requires a focus on enhancing infrastructure. It is evident that depending on other countries
alone will not solve the poverty problem.Submitted by reemaa.94h on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
structure
Ensure that the essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each of them should serve their purpose effectively, with the introduction setting up the argument, the body paragraphs presenting main ideas with support, and the conclusion summarizing the points made.
cohesion
Improve coherence by ensuring that ideas flow logically from one sentence to the next, and from one paragraph to another, using a variety of cohesive devices such as linking words, pronouns and conjunctions.
cohesion
Enhance cohesion by organizing ideas clearly and having a central idea in each paragraph that is expanded upon with examples or explanations.
development
Develop each paragraph with one clear main idea, supported by detailed explanations, examples, or evidence.
task response
To better address the task, make sure to fully respond to all parts of the prompt. Develop your argument with a balanced discussion, acknowledging potential counterarguments or alternative views.
task response
To strengthen your argument and task achievement, provide more specific, relevant examples to back up your points. General statements can be replaced with specific instances or case studies that illustrate the argument more clearly.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!