the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The given table compares the
amount
of people living in Change the quantifier
number
the
Correct article usage
apply
poverty
in six different types of family
in Australia during the year Fix the agreement mistake
families
of
1999.
From the given table, Change preposition
apply
it is clear that
the total percentage of Australian
in six different family types that lived in Fix the agreement mistake
Australians
the
Correct article usage
apply
poverty
was 11%, with the sole parent as the highest proportion and aged couple as the lowest.
During the given period, the sole parent category (21%) has
the highest percentage of Wrong verb form
had
family type
that lived in Replace the word
families
poverty
. Followed with
Change preposition
by
sole
parent category (21%) as the Correct article usage
the sole
second,
and the single individuals with no children (19%) as the third. On the contrary
, the couple with no children (7%) was one of the categories with the least proportion living in poverty
, along with
the single aged person (6%). Lastly
, aged couple was the least family type that lived in poverty
, with the
percentage of only 4%.Correct article usage
a
Submitted by skripsinana8 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Sentences: Add more complex sentences.
▼
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Vocabulary: Replace the words poverty with synonyms.
▼
Vocabulary: Only 6 basic words for charts were used.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "table" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "give" was used 3 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "percentage" was used 3 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "proportion" was used 2 times.
▼