Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is common to believe that

endeavoring

Change the spelling

endeavouring

show examples

to prevent the extinction of rare

species

is useless and recklessly wasteful.

However

, I hold the view that all and sundry should do their best to preserve every single existing wild creature. First and foremost, biodiversity is vital for a healthy and functional ecosystem. Savage animals serve as a critical food source for billions of people around the world

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

since they are rich in proteins and minerals.

In addition

to that, undomesticated organisms are a great source of ecotourism, attracting international visitors.

As a consequence

, the influx of tourists helps boost local economies by providing jobs,

such

as guiding and hotel services.

That is

why extracting wildlife from its natural habitat inevitably leads to disastrous results. When a single

species

becomes extinct, the whole food chain is disrupted, affecting plants and people as well.

For instance

, if carnivores disappeared, the number of herbivorous animals would rise tremendously, having a negative impact on both flora and humans. In spite of

this

, there is a great number of individuals who think there is no need to rescue vulnerable fauna,

due to

the fact that

such

an activity is not economically viable. Some are of the opinion that extinction is a natural process which has occurred repeatedly throughout Earth's history,

whereas

others point out that the money invested in saving threatened types of

animals

Fix the agreement mistake

animal

show examples

species

could be used for other environmental initiatives that yield greater benefits or have a more immediate impact, including habitat restoration or combating climate change.

For example

, critics of

species

conservation suggest that spending millions of dollars to protect a single type of frog when there are pressing human needs, namely access to clean water or healthcare in impoverished communities, seems disproportionate and inefficient. In conclusion,

while

there are valid arguments against investing resources for the preservation of vulnerable

species

, I firmly believe that it is our moral and ethical responsibility to protect the biological variety of our planet.