In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

A group of
people
present the view that allocating a sizable amount of
money
to expanding new railway lines between cities for faster
transportation
, is of paramount importance,
whereas
others believe that the
money
should be devoted to the development of current public
transportation
. I strongly agree with the latter opinion and my reasons will be presented in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, some
people
reasonably argue that governments should spend
money
on the present public transport infrastructures in their countries. In many developing nations, the budget for construction operations is limited.
Therefore
, governments are responsible for spending it in the right and efficient way.
For example
, in India, overcrowding is the primary problem in public
transportation
. Citizens are struggling with infrequent and unreliable
train
schedules.
Consequently
, the government should prioritize expanding and extending the railway lines as opposed to creating new ones.
Furthermore
, since the price of express
train
tickets is not affordable for many individuals in impoverished areas, establishing new railways for fast trains seems a waste of
money
.
On the other hand
, another group of
people
claim that constructing express
transportation
, encourages citizens to use public
transportation
more often. They firmly insist that fast
transportation
can assist
people
in saving their time.
However
, I do not find
this
argument convincing as a considerable number of countries have failed to benefit from
this
approach.
For instance
, in Iran, a very fast
train
railway between two cities was constructed around six years ago,
although
most
people
are unable to pay the fare of
this
train
. In conclusion, in my view, governments are in charge of allocating
money
to existing public transport. The cost-effectiveness and reliability of public
transportation
should be taken into consideration.
Moreover
, the affordability of the
transportation
fares plays a pivotal role in their popularity.
Submitted by maryam.nutrition1988 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
It's important to ensure that your essay directly addresses the question throughout the piece, including both views and your own opinion clearly. While your essay does a good job, more explicit connections and transitions between the views and your opinion can enhance clarity.
coherence and cohesion
To improve logical structure, consider using more varied connectors and transitional phrases to guide the reader more clearly through your argument. This will enhance the flow and cohesion of your essay.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay would benefit from a more diversified range of sentence structures and vocabulary. This can add complexity and sophistication, which are valued in the assessment.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: