Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, a huge number of authorities have
an
Correct article usage
the
show examples
idea of demolishing old buildings. Most of them support
this
with the thought of building new houses
instead
. I partly disagree with
this
statement.
To begin
with, the majority of the old constructions have historical affiliation. My point is that
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
firstly
they were built a
lot
Add the preposition
lot of
show examples
years or even centuries before we were born,
secondly
these properties have their own history, which should be considered as important to
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
mankind.
The certain
Correct article usage
Certain
show examples
building
Fix the agreement mistake
buildings
show examples
or streets might have been designed by a famous architect,
that
Correct pronoun usage
who
show examples
lived back
then
and
this
place can be a representation of his work. By saving historical premises, we keep the history alive. From my perspective,
this
kind of
houses
Fix the agreement mistake
house
show examples
should be reconstructed and given
second
Add an article
a second
show examples
life. Some of them can be turned into apartments, and more meaningful kept as
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
museums.
On the other hand
, because of
fast-changing
Correct article usage
the fast-changing
show examples
lifestyle, some of the constructions are no longer suitable for people to live in. That's the main reason
of
Change preposition
for
show examples
knocking down some chattels in the way of building new homes for families.
For instance
, a lot of the multi-apartment buildings from
period
Add an article
the period
show examples
of
USSR
Correct article usage
the USSR
show examples
don't have
neither
Correct determiner usage
an
show examples
architectural
nor
Correct word choice
or
show examples
cultural legacy. So, there is no reason for them to be renovated.
Instead
, they can be replaced by new properties with modern technology and beautiful design.
Overall
, it is worth all the money in the world to reconstruct old structures, that have value for society, than spending money on demolishing them.
Submitted by sofiaavramenko0906 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure your introduction more clearly outlines your stance on the topic and briefly mentions the points you will discuss. This helps in strengthening the logical flow and clarity of your argument.
task achievement
Although you presented a balanced view, make sure to cover both sides of the argument more evenly and comprehensively. This could involve discussing the drawbacks of demolishing old buildings more thoroughly, to better address the task.
coherence cohesion
Try to use a wider range of cohesive devices and transition words to improve the flow of ideas between paragraphs and sentences. This will make your essay more coherent and easier to follow.
task achievement
Offer more specific examples to support your points. This not only strengthens your argument but also helps in achieving a higher score in task achievement. Mention specific historical buildings or architectural innovations in newly built properties to illustrate your points.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Preservation
  • Restoration
  • Demolition
  • Architectural heritage
  • Cultural significance
  • Tourist attraction
  • Urban landscape
  • Sustainability
  • Conservation
  • Economic benefits
  • Historical landmarks
  • Urban renewal
  • Infrastructure
  • Maintenance costs
  • Modern amenities
  • Building regulations
  • Community identity
  • Heritage conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: