Human activities have negative effects on the environment. Some people believe it is too late to take measures to prevent animals and plants from dying out. Others think actions should be taken to improve the situation. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people argue that the destruction that we did to natural habitats is so disastrous that there is nothing we can do to ameliorate the situation.

While

Linking Words

others insist that it is never too late to take responsibility for our behaviour and take remedial actions. On the one hand,advocates of solving ecological issues positively contend that human beings have been developing our society at the expense of the consumption of energy and other natural resources for a long time,which has seriously threatened the survival of other animal species.So we should be responsible for the terrible consequences of our conduct.

For example

Linking Words

,Dodo birds became extinct because of Europeans’ excessive hunting and the consumption of eating in 1681.What’s more,protecting endangered animals can

also

Linking Words

contribute to government revenue,

for instance

Linking Words

,the Panda has been regarded as one of the Chinese symbols and has promoted tourism development annually.

As a result

Linking Words

,we have a moral obligation to preserve creatures on the brink of extinction.

On the other hand

Linking Words

,the argument for inaction is

also

Linking Words

valid.Many people stress that taxpayers’ money should be allocated to support more urgent areas,including public healthcare,education, infrastructure and so on.To be specific,citizens of developed countries still face the challenges of starvation,poverty,diseases,a high crime rate and so on,there is no strength or energy for them to spare to protect nature and creatures.

In addition

Linking Words

,they

also

Linking Words

believe that it will take decades of effort and considerable economic investment to stop their extinction and there might be a low probability of succeeding.As a

consequeence

Correct your spelling

consequence

, investing in saving and protecting wild animals is unworthy. There seem to be valid reasons on both sides of the argument.And I would say that in the case of developing countries,they should pay more attention to key areas relating to residents’ well-being,since their public finances.For those developed countries,they need to call for urgent actions to delay,halt or even reverse the deteriorating process.