Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the new buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important are old buildings to us?
Construction and destruction of new and old
buildings
respectively have always been a matter of contention amongst the school of thought of architects and construction planners. Some say that the crumbling down of the older derelict building
should be made more intensive and that Fix the agreement mistake
buildings
it
should be replaced by Correct pronoun usage
they
the
newer Correct article usage
apply
ones
. I completely agree with this
standpoint and in the upcoming paragraphs, I shall be talking about the same.
The first supporting idea of the entire obliteration of the old denuded buildings
is the redundancy it has in the
terms of adding values of any sort to the ambience of the city or region they are present in. From the monetary aspect, if we look at it as an asset, it doesn’t have anything to provide or juice out any benefit from. It stays as a drab occupant that Correct article usage
apply
otherwise
if had been replaced by an efficient property, could have generated a
substantial revenue and economyCorrect article usage
apply
from
. Change preposition
apply
Moreover
, owing to the distending population size, many a time such
repudiated buildings
create an unnecessary dearth of space and therefore
curb the potential development of a progressive asset. Then
, reconstruction of such
debilitating buildings
doesn’t seem to be a prudential and justifiable action to go ahead with as it takes a considerable amount of money to convalescence such
hollow structures, the money could, however
, be used for creating new ones
that would be sturdier as well as
much economical to invest on.
Another important reason that would make the inclination more angled towards the ravaging of old buildings
would be the potential threat that it carries for the people that are inhabitants of such
buildings
and even for the people or living beings and the properties nearby. Given that they are old and rickety, they are generally not even able to bear the shocks of earthquakes and are the first ones
to get decrepit from such
catastrophes. In such
cases too, the establishment of the new buildings
are
far more pragmatic, profitable and much safer.
Correct subject-verb agreement
is
Although
the older buildings
of cultural and traditional essence are the major sources to ensnare and enamour the tourist-gaze
, the underlying ill effects of Correct your spelling
tourist gaze
such
worn-out structures are doing more harm than good. Moreover
, the ones
that are neither of heritage importance nor are they sturdy or reconstructable, are blatantly pointless to have.
Conclusively, it could therefore
be stated that building newer buildings
upon the destruction of the older ones
is a better alternative, more often than not.Submitted by mohamedicdl175 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Ensure that your essay directly addresses the question asked. While your position is clear, integrating more specific examples related to the significance of old buildings could provide a more balanced argument.
Coherence & Cohesion
To improve the logical flow, consider using a wider range of linking words and transitional phrases. This can help in making the progression of ideas smoother and more coherent.
Task Achievement
Incorporate specific examples to support your main points. These examples can be historical, cultural, or contemporary instances where old buildings have been preserved or replaced, providing more depth to your argument.
Coherence & Cohesion
Avoid overly complex sentences that might confuse the reader. Striving for clarity in your writing will enhance the overall coherence and cohesion of your essay.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.