Some believe that anyone can create art such as painting, poetry, music and so on. Other think that a person should have special abilities to create art.

For a long time,

art

has been a way for humans to express themselves and enrich their cultures. Regardless, being an artist seems incredible and at some point, it is necessary to human culture as a way to inspire and enrich people's lives across time.

However

, there is a debate about who has the ability to create

art

and who can be called an artist.

This

essay will look at both sides of the argument and provide a personal perspective. One view is that artistic expression is a natural human feature that anyone can tap into. People argue that

art

is about more personal expression than technical skill and that everyone has the capacity. Some even argue that formal training can actually limit creativity.

For instance

, A person who is free and transmits his/her emotions through

art

naturally,

such

as music and painting, is normally more supported than those following patterns. The opposing viewpoint is that exceptional

art

requires specialized abilities that cannot be easily learned.

According to

this

perspective, it requires technical expertise, extensive training, and a deep grasp of artistic principles which are essential for producing truly great works of

art

.

For example

, understanding colour theory is crucial for visual paintings, just as melody and harmony are key for creating amazing music.

To conclude

, the debate over whether

art

can be made by anyone or if it requires a specialized talent. Ultimately, each person must decide what level of expertise they aspire to get. I personally believe that both sides make some valid points.

While

it's true that

art

involves personal interpretation and anyone can be creative, it's

also

true that crafting exceptional artwork takes technical prowess that can take years of dedicated practice to develop.