Nowadays, there has been an upward trend in traffic and pollution issues. Many individuals feel that the solution to the current environment is to raise petrol costs. In my opinion, though
this
would have a beneficial effect, I disagree with Linking Words
this
extent.
On the one hand, there are many drawbacks and advantages of high-cost fuels that can be explained for a variety of reasons. First and foremost, more expensive fuel costs would encourage many citizens to travel by either public transportation or walking. To illustrate, if the cost of petrol is high, Linking Words
then
various individuals would prefer to commute by public transportation on a daily basis, which can reduce the production of toxic gases. Linking Words
However
, numerous average households that are struggling with paying bills and debt might prefer to stay home rather than take a short trip as an enjoyable experience.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, a wide range of measures that do not target the less wealthy elements of society would have a stronger impact. The solution might be effective for the middle class rather than the upper class. Linking Words
This
means that wealthy people who have solid financial backing won’t be bothered since they have too many expenses to spend. Linking Words
To begin
with, to tackle the problem of traffic congestion, the authorities should invest more in renewable energy sources Linking Words
such
as solar energy, Linking Words
as well as
road maintenance and construction.
In conclusion, though expensive fuels can be advantageous, concentrating on using renewable energy sources and improving roads can be a wise choice. Linking Words
Therefore
, citizens should learn how to commute by public transport more than in their own vehiclesLinking Words
rbtech65