Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should open the door to more people who have fled their homes from wars or natural disasters and provide them with food and shelter.
This
essay completely disagrees with
this
statement because it will put a strain on the host countries’ financial and social security. The first reason why developed countries should limit the number of evacuees entering their homeland is that states have to share their budget in order to accommodate those immigrants.
This
is to say that the local residents could receive fewer social welfare payments and services than they should have had.
Moreover
, a considerable amount of money from governments is
also
allocated for providing necessities for these foreign displaced people.
For example
, during the Iraq civil war which started some years ago, hundreds of thousands of refugees fled to the neighbouring country Iran, costing
this
host millions of dollars in humanitarian activities. The same situation repeated in Finland when the Ukraine war broke out
last
year and Helsinki had to spend a considerable part of its budget on refugee camps
while
tightening the purse strings on public services and social assistance to its citizens. The second reason for objecting to the opinion of allowing more refugees is its long-term ramifications on society.
This
is because most of them are poor or illiterate people who completely live on humanitarian aid.
As a result
, they not only fail to contribute to the host country but
also
create more potential conflicts and crimes in local areas.
For instance
, a Finnish study reports a higher rate of crimes
such
as thieves, prostitution, drugs and violence in areas where refugee camps are located. As it requires local authorities substantial time and effort to settle
this
community,
such
situations persist and make local inhabitants feel insecure when going out.
To conclude
, too many refugees entering their territory could be a burden for even wealthy nations for both financial and social reasons.
Submitted by nha7032463 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence and Cohesion
Ensure a clear introduction with your thesis statement, and a concise conclusion that reinforces your main points.
Task Achievement
Try to introduce counter-arguments to your main standpoint, showing a thorough examination of the topic.
Coherence and Cohesion
Enhance the logical flow between paragraphs with better transition phrases to seamlessly guide the reader through your argument.
Language
Increase the variety and complexity of your sentences to make your writing more engaging and to demonstrate a higher proficiency in English.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Refugees
  • Asylum seekers
  • Humanitarian aid
  • Integration
  • Multiculturalism
  • Economic impact
  • Public services
  • International law
  • Conventions relating to the status of refugees
  • Labor market
  • Cultural enrichment
  • Burden-sharing
  • Resettlement programs
  • Host country
  • Border security
  • Comprehensive policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: