Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is true that these days, many wild

animals

are on the verge of extinction.

Thus

, many people argue that authorities and individuals should contribute to the

conservation

of these species. Meanwhile, there is

also

a widespread belief that priority should be given to human welfare. In

this

essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion. On the one hand, the idea that countries and individuals should protect these

animals

from dying out is grounded in certain valid points.

Firstly

, endangered

animals

are often keystone species within ecosystems, playing critical roles in maintaining biodiversity and ecological balance. Their extinction can lead to cascading effects throughout the ecosystem, ultimately impacting human well-being through disrupted ecosystem services.

Secondly

, many believe that humans have a moral obligation to protect wildlife from extinction, especially

due to

the fact that human activity is a primary cause of the decline of many species.

Animals

have intrinsic value and a right to exist independent of their usefulness to humans.

Additionally

, preserving biodiversity ensures that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of life on Earth.

On the other hand

, some argue that resources should be directed towards addressing pressing human needs, including poverty, hunger, and healthcare, rather than

conservation

efforts. In many parts of the world,

such

as parts of sub-Saharan Africa, the human population faces severe challenges like poverty, famine, epidemics, and natural disasters, with citizens struggling to secure basic necessities amidst prolonged droughts and food shortages. If a government allocates a significant portion of its budget to animal

conservation

efforts at the expense of addressing pressing human needs, local communities may face devastating consequences, intensifying difficulties in making a living and sparking ethical debates about prioritizing wildlife over the immediate well-being of its people. In conclusion,

while

it is essential to address human needs and alleviate suffering, I believe that protecting endangered

animals

is not mutually exclusive to addressing human-centric issues. Both can and should be pursued simultaneously, as they are interconnected. Preserving biodiversity is crucial for maintaining the health and resilience of ecosystems, which ultimately support human well-being.

Moreover

, many

conservation

efforts can have positive economic impacts, contributing to sustainable development and poverty alleviation.