Government should spend money on railways rahter than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

It is generally claimed that the

trains

are what the authorities should invest money in, not the highways. I completely agree with

this

statement, as not only is it the safer way of travelling but

also

it serves a wider spectrum of citizens.

To begin

with,

trains

are the least dangerous method of transportation, as unfortunate incidents on the

railways

are a sporadic rarity. Evidence for

this

was provided in the recent report established by the World Transport Organization, which indicates that never has the annual number of accidents on

railways

exceeded that of collisions on the roads.

Therefore

,

it is clear that

the expansion of the

railways

might contribute to the safety of inhabitants.

Moreover

, railway

trains

undoubtedly fulfil the needs of a broad spectrum of people.

In other words

, travelling by train can target adults,

as well as

children or seniors, who are not able to ride a car by themselves.

For instance

, elderly people are often not capable of driving

due to

their health conditions, so a local train is their only possibility to either travel or simply get to a supermarket.

Similarly

, children, who are not old enough to get their driving license can comfortably use

trains

as their means of transportation to school.

Therefore

,

railways

are an investment which could satisfy the demands of many people.

To conclude

, I strongly believe that authorities should provide capital for new

railways

rather than highways because it is a safer method of transportation and satisfies the needs of a variety of citizens.