Some people think that governments should spend money for faster public transportation, others think that there are other important priorities (e.g. cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The question of whether governments should allocate funds towards improving public
transportation
for faster travel is a topic that garners diverse opinions. Some argue that investing in faster public
transportation
is essential for various reasons,
while
others prioritize different concerns
such
as cost and environmental impact. In
this
essay, I will delve into both perspectives and offer my opinion on the matter. Advocates for spending on faster public
transportation
highlight several
benefits
.
Firstly
, efficient public
transportation
can alleviate traffic congestion, reducing travel times for commuters and enhancing
overall
productivity. In cities where traffic congestion is a significant issue, faster public
transportation
can
also
lead to improved air quality and reduced carbon emissions, contributing to environmental sustainability.
Secondly
, investing in faster public
transportation
can stimulate economic growth by increasing connectivity between different regions, attracting businesses, and facilitating the movement of goods and services.
On the other hand
, critics argue that there are other pressing priorities that warrant government funding.
Firstly
, they point out that
investments
in public
transportation
, particularly for high-speed options, can be prohibitively expensive and may not always yield significant returns on investment.
In other words
, governments must carefully weigh the costs and
benefits
of
such
projects against other pressing needs,
such
as healthcare, education, and social welfare.
Secondly
, concerns about the environmental impact of large-scale
transportation
projects, particularly those involving increased energy consumption and land use, cannot be ignored. Critics argue that
investments
in sustainable alternatives,
such
as renewable energy infrastructure and urban planning initiatives, may offer greater long-term
benefits
for both people and the planet. In my opinion,
while
there are valid concerns about the cost and environmental impact of investing in faster public
transportation
, the
benefits
of
such
investments
outweigh the drawbacks. Improved public
transportation
not only enhances mobility and connectivity but
also
promotes economic development and environmental sustainability in the long run.
Therefore
, I believe that governments should prioritize
investments
in faster public
transportation
while
also
ensuring that these projects are conducted in a sustainable and cost-effective manner, taking into account the needs of both current and future generations.
Submitted by Leb.7149 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure you have a clear introduction and conclusion that effectively outline your thesis and summarize your key points. Try to make your stance clear from the beginning and reiterate it in the conclusion for greater impact.
coherence cohesion
Develop a more logical structure by clearly dividing your essay into paragraphs, each dedicated to a specific point or argument. Use linking phrases and topic sentences to ensure a smooth flow between paragraphs.
coherence cohesion
To support your main points, include more concrete examples and evidence. Specific facts, figures, or case studies can strengthen your arguments and make your essay more persuasive.
task achievement
Ensure your response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. While you have discussed both views and provided your opinion, further elaboration and evidence could make your positions clearer and more compelling.
task achievement
Work on presenting your ideas more clearly and comprehensively. Aim for precision in your language to convey your arguments effectively. Avoid broad statements by being specific about the ideas and opinions you present.
task achievement
Incorporate more relevant and specific examples to support your arguments. Bringing in real-world evidence or hypothetical scenarios can help illustrate your points more vividly and make your essay more engaging.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • government expenditure
  • public transportation infrastructure
  • congestion
  • productivity
  • environmental sustainability
  • allocate funds
  • cost-effective
  • balancing priorities
  • reduce carbon emissions
  • urban planning
What to do next:
Look at other essays: