Due to
the increasing demand for fossil fuels, it is said that undiscovered areas should be used in order to obtain more resources. I totally disagree with the suggested statement since opening new spaces to exploitation would cause environmental harm and generate conflicts between powerful countries.
The exploitation of spaces that might contain oil and gas will lead to the destruction of the environment. Linking Words
Furthermore
, extracting these forms of energy to supply consumer societies causes important harm to the biosphere of untouched spaces. Linking Words
For instance
, in the ISO (International Sea Organisation) 2024 study, the group discovered that, since the 2000s, the extraction of fossil resources in protected oceanic places has led to the death of 70% of the surrounding fauna Linking Words
as well as
the extinction of certain species of plants.
When exploiting new areas full of natural fossil energies, countries desire to have control of these spots. Linking Words
Moreover
, these states tend to start conflicts in order to claim the locations of their desires. Linking Words
For example
, in 2011, the ONU estimated that the Arctic sea still possesses more than 60% of natural gas and oil resources in the world. Because of Linking Words
this
statement, powerful states near Linking Words
this
sought-after place, Linking Words
such
as Russia Linking Words
in addition
to the United States of America, have started several conflicts in order to conquer the Arctic. Linking Words
This
situation illustrates that opening new areas of utilization might create geopolitical tensions.
Linking Words
To conclude
, I wholeheartedly disagree with the suggested statement in consequence of the fact that it does not take into consideration the impact of exploitation on the environment and the geopolitical tensions it might lead to.Linking Words
santos_dij