Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals say consuming sugary

foods

and drinks raises the risk of health problems.

Therefore

, the price of these

products

should be increased to prevent consumers from eating them.

Although

I understand why some advocate the aforementioned view, I assert that

this

argument is not an ideal solution to tackle the problem. Some argue that if the high authorities yearn for healthy societies, they should increase sweet refreshment prices to curb consumption. One possible explanation for

this

belief is that the adversaries may think sweet

foods

and drinks are the primary factors for human health. Indeed, consuming too many

products

containing high sugar levels can render a risk of health issues,

such

as obesity, diabetes, and heart attack,

hence

hanging human well-being in the balance. Another factor reinforcing the perspective above is the convenient access to these food and drink

products

. Consumers can purchase sugary beverages and sweet cakes at any convenience store without problems.

Moreover

, these things have low costs, rendering them accessible to many walks of life.

Nevertheless

, I maintain the perspective that the plan to increase prices for sweet

foods

and drinks to motivate people to eat less sugary refreshments is inefficient. The first highlight that needs to be mentioned is the sudden price rise, which can be detrimental to low-income families. Families that are not financially well-off might be unable to afford their kids' favourite

foods

,

such

as ice cream or candy floss, because of the dramatic cost, diminishing their well-being. The second idea that needs to be mentioned is that increasing the prices of sugary refreshments to prevent people from taking in high levels of sugar can negatively impact the quality of life. It forces mature people, especially parents, to work around the clock to earn enough money to buy necessities

instead

of using that quality time for their children, leading to the deficiency of love, care, and respect. Unfortunately,

this

can lead them to become dangerous culprits in the future

due to

this

traumatic adolescence. In conclusion, reducing sugar consumption is a pressing urge to improve public well-being, but simply increasing the costs of these

products

is not a suitable solution to restrict

this

consumption, and I agree with

this

viewpoint.