Some people belive that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Generally speaking, different types of crimes should be followed by specific

punishments

. The controversial issue is whether these

punishments

must be based on the motivations or fixed ones must be applied. Motivation is a crucial factor that must be taken into account. Some people believe that the only determining feature when committing different crimes is the type of

crime

. Whether it is committed intentionally or not, the criminals would be sentenced to the same

punishments

.

For example

, in some countries, execution is the penalty for both who murdered a person in an accident and an individual who is decapitated intentionally.

On the other hand

, some argue that the motivation behind a

crime

is a crucial factor.

This

perspective recognizes the intricate nature of human behaviour, where the reasons behind an action can significantly alter the legal outcome. In the previous example, the accused could be acquitted if their motivations were legally deemed to have led to a mistaken

crime

.

This

complexity invites us to consider the deeper layers of criminal justice.

To sum up

, the intention of committing a

crime

must be determinative regarding

punishments

. The circumstances may not make the final result different, but they could affect the sentence of the criminals.