Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices will help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Transport
pollution is a pressing matter in many countries. To tackle this
problem, it is assumed that authorities should fund the public transport
system. Also
, reducing its charge could result in more usage of public transport
among people
.
Nowadays, individuals tend to prefer owning private transportation rather than utilizing public transportation. Thus
, the reason behind it is comfort. Using a vehicle with plenty of people
means that it is crowded and uncomfortable. In addition
, the customers need to follow to timetable which cannot get along with
everyone's schedule. However
, having a private car or bike would save time and offer more freedom to individuals. In some cases, people
must
need a car because they have children or have to stop at a number of locations daily. Verb problem
apply
For example
, if you have kids, you must drop off them first at their school or kindergarten. Nevertheless
, there are numerous choices such
as bikes, scooters and so on which create zero contamination in the environment. As a result
, governments investing in public transport
could have lower consequences as it was expected to be, even though, cars can pollute areas more, for some individuals it is mandatory. Nonetheless
, others can still own private vehicles
, but not contaminate nature.
On the other hand
, it is true that if public transport
systems improve, it would attract much more passengers. Therefore
, decreasing the fee of public transportation would offer reasonable prices for those who cannot afford their own private vehicles
. On top of that, governments can not only support public transport
but encourage people
to own bikes and scooters. For instance
, cities that are very crowded are not available to install vehicles
that are adequate for their population, in this
case, it is effective for citizens to have vehicles
such
as bikes.
In conclusion, putting money into developing public transport
could attract more passengers , but there are other ways that would have better outcomes. Moreover
, the contamination level of vehicles
would not decrease considerably.Submitted by buyabuya201 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Make sure to develop your argument more evenly. While you've discussed the limitations of investing in public transport well, it's crucial to explore more thoroughly how these investments, alongside reduced ticket prices, could positively impact pollution through increased public transport usage.
coherence cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, try to structure your paragraphs more clearly. Each paragraph should have a single main idea that is introduced, explained, and then concluded. Additionally, consider using a wider range of linking phrases to improve the flow between sentences and paragraphs.
task achievement
When presenting examples, ensure they are directly relevant and clearly support your argument. While discussing alternative transportation like bikes and scooters is valid, directly connect these examples to how they can substantially reduce pollution in the context of public transport investment and ticket price reduction.
task achievement
You've presented a balanced view by addressing both the benefits and limitations of government investments in public transport and reducing ticket prices, which is important for a complete discussion.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are clear, effectively framing the essay's discussion and summarizing the main points made, which is excellent for guiding the reader.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?