It is often suggested that
scientists
and
technology
experts
contribute more to
society
than artists. I agree with
this
view.
Although
it isn’t easy to measure someone’s value to
society
, I personally feel that
scientists
and
technology
experts
have a more significant impact not only on our
society
’s economy
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
also
on essential services that improve our quality of life.
First of all, science,
technology
, and the arts are all very productive industries.
However
,
while
there is a shortage of
scientists
and technicians, there tend to be fewer jobs available for creative workers.
As a result
, creative people often spend more time unemployed, in temporary, low-skilled jobs, or working on eccentric projects that would need to generate more income.
Consequently
, they contribute less to
society
financially. An example of
this
is a study conducted in the United States which revealed that approximately 64% of individuals with a degree in the arts end up working in fields unrelated to their artistic expertise.
Secondly
,
although
art and music are often greatly respected and appreciated, it is possible to survive without them.
On the other hand
, science and
technology
are necessary to provide power, water, medicine, communications, food and much more.
Therefore
, we could argue that
experts
in these fields are far more valuable.
For instance
, in times of crisis or natural disasters, it is scientific advancements that prove critical in saving lives and rebuilding communities.
In conclusion, I believe
scientists
and
technology
experts
contribute significantly more to
society
than artists. They have more job opportunities and play a vital part in fields like healthcare, infrastructure, and innovation.
While
art and music hold great cultural value, the role of science and
technology
in providing essential services and improving lives makes them more valuable contributors to
society
overall
.