The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Today is known as the era of centralisation. From

this

aspect, the questions about whether only government action can address

severe

Correct article usage

the severe

show examples

consequences caused by the lack of housing in big

cities

are raised. In my opinion, the government action can solve

this

issue to some extent. Irrefutably,

citizens

can have a chance to dwell in public

houses

.

This

is because, unlike rural areas, governments can pour massive sums into public

houses

and allocate these

houses

for poverty

citizens

who live in big

cities

.

This

obviously leads to an increase in accommodations in big

cities

and

this

in turn encourages them to reside in a better quality of life. What is more,

although

a plethora of costs cannot be ignored, the

authorities

can implement housing policies. To exemplify, the authority enacts strict laws related to moving organisations and installs a majority of necessary buildings

such

as apartments, hospitals, and schools in rural areas.

This

,

therefore

, results in the promotion of huge migration from big

cities

to rural areas.

Nevertheless

, the

authorities

are hardly likely to shift citizen's preference for living in

cities

.

In other words

, since

citizens

already receive various benefits including job opportunities, high-paid jobs, high-quality education, and cultural events so, more

citizens

are likely to continue to migrate to

cities

in the future. To recapitulate, the

authorities

are hardly likely to shift citizen's preference for living in

cities

but

citizens

can have a chance to dwell in public

houses

and the

authorities

can implement housing policies.

Thus

,

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

government action can solve the severe consequences caused by the lack of housing in big

cities

.