The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help solve this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
#cars #roads #parts #world #pollution #people #governments #money #development #transportation #systems
In
this
modern era, there is more and more usage of private cars
in developed countries. The growth of the owners of cars
affects air
pollution
as quickly as they grow.Some believe that the authorities should improve the public metro and bus, while
others think that they need to invest in the electronic car
development. In this
essay, I will show both sides of the phenomenon and provide my personal opinion.
To start with, public transportation has many benefits for both society and the government. This
is because when citizens buy tickets, the money from their purchases goes directly to national income. For instance
, in 2018,when the tram was moved from Tashkent to Samarkand, there was fifty percent more income from public transportation than it was in the past. At the same time it was good for people because it became easier and cheaper to move around the city.
On the other hand
, it is unacceptable to prohibit driving a car
in civilized cities,thus
, investing in cars
that are not harm can also
decrease air
pollution
or global warming.There are many types of cars
such
as electric cars
which will not harm our air
. For example
, there are car
brands such
as TESLA and BYD. At the same time, many popular car
brands like Mercedes-Benz,BMW, and AUDI also
release their own electric cars
that are cheaper and useful rather than cars
on fuel. For example
, Norway is the country where the majority use only electic cars
like TESLA. That's why countries' nature is not polluted and it keeps its beauty.
In conclusion, the air
pollution
produced by cars
has indeed contributed greatly to the global warming problem. In my opinion, the government should invest in the public , as it can benefit both parties and reduce the air
pollution
greatly, in comparison to the alternative cars
.Submitted by madinabonu.bm on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
A stronger thesis statement in the introduction could enhance your position and guide the reader.
task achievement
Try to develop your examples more thoroughly to deeply explore the impacts and benefits of each viewpoint.
coherence cohesion
Be cautious with spelling and grammar to maintain clarity throughout your essay. For example, 'electronic car development' should be 'electric car development', and 'electic cars like TESLA' should be 'electric cars like Tesla'.
task achievement
You effectively discussed both views and provided a clear personal opinion in the conclusion. Well done!
coherence cohesion
Your essay structure is logical and clear, guiding the reader through your argument effectively.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!