Directors of large organizations are much higher salary than ordinary employees do. Some people think it's necessary, but others are of the opinion that it's unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

These days, ordinary

employers

are paying less compared to their supervisors.

While

it's upright towards bosses, as they are the founders of the companies, it's unfair towards employees who accomplish most of the tasks. On the one hand, directors have the right to earn much higher salaries than

employers

. They are the heads of the companies and founded the company from the beginning. They put all their effort into establishing and succeeding

this

company.

Moreover

, they have to have good human management skills and accomplish their heavy duties by decision-making power.

For example

, if they see the company as having the ability to resolve mutual conflicts and harmonize their teams, the workers cannot work with higher productivity.

Thus

, it's necessary for

employers

to have much higher salaries.

On the other hand

, it's kind of unfair towards workers who work for far more hours than

employers

. They accomplish more tasks and have an overload of schedules and duties.

For instance

, nurses and medical staff often work long hours, handle critical tasks, and deal with high levels of stress in hospitals. Despite their crucial role in patient care, their salaries are typically lower than those of hospital administrators or directors.

Therefore

, from one side, the salary gap is not fair for some workers.

Thus

, low

wage

Fix the agreement mistake

wages

show examples

can have a negative impact on employee morale and motivation. In conclusion,

while

acknowledging the foundational role of directors, fair compensation should reflect the significant contributions of all employees, aligning with their duties and responsibilities within the organization.