Goverments investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Goverments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

In

this

current world, some

people

tend to believe that governments should spend more money on public utilities than on the arts,

while

others think

otherwise

. From my perspective, there are truths for both views. The following paragraphs will clarify my stance.

Firstly

, the authorities have allocated some of the

state

budget to fund creative activities, whether to support musicians or to subsidise theatre.

This

action has had several benefits, like the rapid growth in the music industry and the development of show business. When

this

musical business grows and

this

performance production develops, society will benefit.

For instance

, job vacancies will be more available, because those kinds of industries will need to involve a huge number of

people

. Citizens will

also

have access to better art performances, supplying them with numerous entertainments.

Therefore

, the

state

's involvement in

this

sector will benefit

people

.

Secondly

,

however

, governments should be concerned with the better availability of public services. Since these items are basic human needs, they should be well provided. To do

this

, authorities should budget some money for them.

For example

, by providing good health facilities, the

state

will support its

people

to have better health access.

Moreover

, by letting individuals have the opportunity to use fine public

transports

Fix the agreement mistake

transport

show examples

or high-quality education, the

state

will improve its citizens' quality of life.

Thus

, spending money on public facilities is

also

quite pivotal. On balance, since funding for the arts and providing public access are significant things to do, it is pretty difficult to make a conclusion, whether I agree or disagree.