The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people disagree with rebuilding contractors;

however

, it is expensive. The rebuilding of historic structures in the majority of urban areas in many countries is cost-effective.In fact, governments have responded to existing construction, new housing, and road development. In my opinion, if governments have to

rebubble

Correct your spelling

bubble

constructors in the majority of urban areas, they have to think about whether the area or place is essential to rebuild or not and whether the place is important to people or not.In fact, every rebuild has to spend a lot of money.

On the other hand

, new housing and roads have to be developed, which leads to investment in countries and makes the economy grow. The fundamental qualities of a country are roads and new residents. In conclusion,

while

there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, a balanced approach that considers the unique context and needs of each city is essential. Governments should prioritize investments in new housing and road development to address immediate infrastructure needs,

while

simultaneously allocating resources towards the preservation of old buildings to safeguard cultural heritage and promote urban vitality. Striking

this

balance ensures sustainable urban development that preserves the past

while

building for the future.