In a lot of nations nowadays, it is the case that
people
die later than has ever been the case before. On the one hand, some
people
may feel
this
has propagated issues for the
government
.
On the other hand
, some
people
argue that there are clear advantages with a high prevalence of elderly
people
in the population. In
this
essay, I will argue that the declining youth population has mostly created devastating economic consequences for the
government
, as
this
forces them to
increase
their expenditure on public services.
Having an increasingly ageing demographic will likely
increase
the demand for public necessities
such
as
:Remove the comma
show examples
healthcare, retirement homes and pensions.
Consequently
, it is almost certain that the
government
will have to
increase
drastically the spending budget it allocates to
theirCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
spending to match the rise in consumption. Whilst
this
may benefit
the Correct article usage
show examples
society for the greater good as it's likely to
increase
the quality of the services,
this
will likely mean that those spent funds could have likely been spent
elsewhere
more productively.
This
is because despite
such
necessities being essential pillars to the
wellbeingCorrect your spelling
show examples
of society, I believe that governments
due to
the rising ageing populations may feel pressured into not spending it anywhere else, and given that the elderly are economically inactive,
this
will not likely
increase
the economy's productivity and
instead
could have the adverse effect of increasing taxes in the nation to cover the loss.
For instance
, having explored
this
topic in my Sociology lessons, I have found out the devastating
long termAdd a hyphen
show examples
impact which a high proportion of older
people
has on
economiesCorrect article usage
show examples
of Japan and Singapore. Before becoming dominated
withChange preposition
show examples
the elderly, these countries were far more productive economically and had lower tax rates which has allowed them to grow economically.
Hence
, the increasing life expectancy has devastating implications for the
government
as it puts
constraintFix the agreement mistake
show examples
on their resources, and reduces their ability to spend
elsewhere
.
Nevertheless
, one of the main arguments in favour of an elderly demographic is that retired
people
can take care of
children
in dual-career couples.
This
is because
such
couples will likely simply not have time to provide for their
children
, as both of the parents will be working. In that
their parents, who will not be working, may take the role of child carers and
therefore
this
will allow the governance to maintain its workforce size.
Furthermore
,
this
may have wider benefits for family dynamics. One reason for
this
is that
children
are more likely to be able to spend more time with their grandparents which will allow for family bonding. Given the generational gap which is growing between the youth and the elderly,
this
could be an effective solution to ensure there is a close relationship
ofChange preposition
show examples
children
with their older family members.
For example
, back when I was a toddler, my grandmother and my grandparents used to look after me and my other siblings.
Therefore
,
this
provides a foundation for families in the long term as it involves several stakeholders within a family environment and will mean that the economy is more likely to be productive, which can benefit the
government
massively.
In conclusion, it is true that an increasing percentage of older
people
can help families where parents may require assistance as they can seek out
for lookingChange preposition
show examples
after their
children
.
However
, on the whole, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the disadvantages as the governing bodies will experience an increasing need to fund common services, which has a clear opportunity cost.