Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.

Some people state that the

fact

that CEOs of huge corporations have a good income,

while

their members of staff get paid significantly less, affects employees’ mental health negatively and leads to awful consequences. I agree with the opinion that it is fair for founders to get paid more

due to

their wide experience and amount of responsibility.

To begin

with, it is a widespread

fact

that staff have much lower income compared to their boss (even though they have more hours of

work

), and having that low salary might lead to losing motivation, apathy, and depression (which even might lead to suicidal decisions, as was exemplified by Japanese statistics).

As a result

, employees decrease their productivity and activities of the

company

, by producing bad quality goods. I,

however

, believe that it is essential to have a better salary for the owner of the

company

. The

work

of directors is usually underestimated,

although

being crucial, they have a number of duties like taking sort of risks, managing the crew, sorting particular offers, and setting the standards for the

company

. In

fact

, on these

responsibilities

Add a comma

responsibilities,

show examples

the

company

is usually held.

For example

, if founders cannot harmonize their teams and solve mutual conflicts, the employees working under them cannot

work

with high productivity.

Therefore

, the

company

owners’ salary is fully approved by their efforts.

To conclude

, despite the

fact

that employees

work

more and get less which leads to certain mental disorders, people should not forget that CEOs, as founders, put more effort into their own start-ups.