There is no denying the fact that the newest online method to read news of books replaced people's behaviour rather than the traditional ones.
Linking Words
While it
is a commonly held belief that the cheapest way to read and the availability of online sources will make nobody want to buy printed journals or books. There is Correct word choice
It
also
an argument that opposite it. I believe that online websites are more practical and better.
Linking Words
To begin
with, the unique methods of reading are more efficient Linking Words
according to
the technological revolution that we face. Linking Words
In other words
, It can provide several features Linking Words
such
as reading everywhere, at any time, Linking Words
while
we browse various social media platforms. Linking Words
In addition
, online websites have a significant role in increasing the visual Linking Words
as well as
leading individuals to read even if they do not Linking Words
wantto
. Correct your spelling
want to
For example
, traditional printed newspapers and books can not provide multi-media templates Linking Words
such
as videos, audio and numerous pictures.
Another point to consider, traditional methods contributed a lack to ------ the modern generation. It is Linking Words
also
possible to say that our generation prefers to have the news and information in a very easy way. Linking Words
However
, Linking Words
this
action is only available on social media and websites. Linking Words
Moreover
, demonstrates a credible source to the audience and builds a link of trust between them. Linking Words
For instance
, a survey by Reuters News Agency showed that online sources are more efficient and have various benefits Linking Words
according to
people's opinions.
In conclusion, despite people having different views I tend to believe that I stand up with the new online method for numerous cases Linking Words
as well as
it is more cheap and useful.Linking Words
zaidamrat5