Some people believe that governments should ban dangerous sports even though others claim they should have the freedom to choose a sport to their liking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
The debate over whether governments should ban dangerous
sports
is a complex one, touching on issues of personal freedom, public health, and societal responsibility. While
I understand the arguments for protecting individuals from harm, I believe that people should generally have the freedom to choose their sports
, even if they are dangerous. My stance is based on three main points: personal autonomy, the value of risk in personal growth, and the effectiveness of regulation versus prohibition.
First,
personal autonomy is a fundamental principle in democratic societies. Adults should have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including the choice to engage in high-risk activities
. Just as people have the freedom to make other potentially harmful choices, such
as smoking or consuming alcohol, they should also
be allowed to participate in extreme sports
if they understand and accept the risks involved.
Second,
engaging in dangerous sports
can provide significant benefits that outweigh the risks for many individuals. These activities
often require discipline, courage, and physical fitness, contributing to personal development and mental well-being. The thrill and sense of achievement from overcoming challenges in extreme sports
can enhance an individual's quality of life, promoting a sense of fulfillment
and happiness that safer Change the spelling
fulfilment
activities
might not provide.
Lastly
, banning dangerous sports
might not be the most effective way to ensure safety
. Prohibitions can drive these activities
underground, making them even more dangerous due to
the lack of regulation and oversight. Instead
of outright bans, governments could focus on improving safety
standards and providing better education about the risks involved. For instance
, mandatory safety
training and strict enforcement of safety
gear usage could mitigate the dangers without infringing on personal freedoms.
In conclusion, while
the intent to protect individuals from harm is commendable, banning dangerous sports
is not the optimal solution. Respecting personal autonomy, recognizing the benefits of risk-taking, and focusing on regulation rather than prohibition are better approaches to addressing the concerns associated with these activities
.Submitted by Zaher on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The arguments presented are strong and well-supported, but including more specific examples or data could strengthen the essay further.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly to maintain coherence. While the essay is already well-structured, minor adjustments could enhance the flow even more.
task achievement
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and provides a balanced examination of both sides of the argument.
coherence cohesion
Logical structure is maintained throughout the essay, with well-defined introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
coherence cohesion
The main points are well-supported with logical reasoning. The explanation of personal autonomy, the benefits of risk, and the issues with prohibition are all clearly articulated.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.