The government should sometimes infringe on people’s freedom for the security of society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that individual
freedom
is more important than the security
of society by the government
. However
, my view of this
issue is that social security
and safety is
a higher priority than people’s Correct subject-verb agreement
are
freedom
, and next,
freedom
should be guaranteed as well.
To begin
with, I firmly believe that the government
can sometimes invade people’s freedom
to ensure the security
of people. The government
’s role is to prevent potential dangers in advance and assure safety and security
even if it makes people uncomfortable or inconvenient. For example
, the implementation of drug and alcohol tests is needed to remove hazards in the workplace. There is a possibility of violating worker’s freedom
, but it plays an important role in making a safe work environment.
Nevertheless
, as long as ensuring security
, individual freedom
shouldn’t be interrupted by the government
. Every person has the right to speak out their opinions and protest to get what they want. It is the basic right guaranteed in fundamental law. For instance
, from the 1970s to 1980s in South Korea, if you argued your opinion, you could be caught by police. It was a very unfair situation in the view of the present, but at the time, there were a lot of overuses of the government
’s power.
To sum up
, I am of the opinion that people’s freedom
can be infringed by the government
to prevent dangerous situations and ensure the security
and safety of society, in contrast
, I partly agree that personal freedom
should be guaranteed if the security
is not invaded.Submitted by a46615883 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay provides a clear and comprehensive response to the task, and your main points are well-supported. However, consider further elaborating on your points and providing more specific examples for better clarity. Also, be sure to address both sides of the argument equally to present a balanced view.
task achievement
Ensure your arguments are fully developed and well-supported with relevant specific examples. You provided a good example related to drug and alcohol tests and historical context in South Korea. However, adding more examples can strengthen your argument.
coherence cohesion
Work on the logical structure of your essay. While your ideas flow well, there's room for improvement in organizing your thoughts more cohesively. Consider using more transitional phrases to connect your ideas more smoothly.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, which effectively frame your arguments. However, refining your conclusion to succinctly restate your key points can enhance the cohesiveness of your essay.
task achievement
Your essay effectively reaches a complete response to the task, addressing the question directly and providing a strong viewpoint on the topic.
task achievement
You presented clear and comprehensive ideas supported by relevant examples, such as the implementation of drug and alcohol tests and the historical context in South Korea.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, which effectively frame your arguments, making your essay cohesive and easy to follow.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!