In today's world,
and housing problems significantly impact human
.
some argue that reducing environmental
should be the government's primary focus to prevent diseases, others believe that other issues deserve more attention. I contend that harmful substances in
are a more significant
than
, leading to more severe
issues, including cancer.
, I disagree with the notion that governments should prioritize reducing environmental
over other
concerns.
One argument against focusing primarily on environmental
is that other
risks,
as
safety, may pose a greater
.
companies and heavy industries do contaminate streams and rivers, leading to water
, many countries mitigate
issue with advanced filtration systems.
, in Taiwan, 80% of households use domestic water filters, ensuring access to clean drinking water.
, housing problems like overcrowded and poorly organized communities are widespread, but their
impacts are often less severe than those caused by contaminated
.
,
environmental
is a concern, it may not warrant the highest priority when compared to other
risks.
, the presence of carcinogenic additives in
is a growing concern that demands immediate government attention. Research indicates that harmful substances in
products are a leading cause of cancer.
, Sudan Red, a dye used in solvents and clothing, is sometimes illicitly added to
to cut costs, leading to severe
issues. Unlike environmental pollutants, harmful
additives are directly and rapidly absorbed by the intestines, posing an immediate
to
.
, governments should prioritize
safety to protect public
effectively.
In conclusion,
reducing environmental
and addressing housing problems are important, the presence of carcinogenic substances in
poses a more immediate and severe
to public
. Governments should focus more on ensuring
safety to prevent illnesses and diseases. By tackling foodborne
risks, we can better protect public
and reduce the incidence of serious diseases like cancer.