Countries with longer working hours enjoy an economic advantage, but they suffer from certain negative social effects, do you agree or disagree?

It is true that in

this

day and age, opinion is divided over whether economic merit outweighs the negative impact caused by working hours. In

this

essay, I will look at both sides of

this

debate

as well as

offer my own point of view. Turning first of all to the arguments in favour of

this

idea, it goes without saying that overworking leads to health problems

such

as physical ailments, like diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart maladies.

Furthermore

, mental issues

also

cannot be ignored

due to

the fact that suffering from mental illness could be a reason for quitting a job. At the same time, overworked individuals have less chance to go back home and relax and care for their bodies physically and mentally. As far as the other side of

this

debate is concerned, it is generally acknowledged that the workforce at the workplace is unable to be replaced and the economic effects obtained from the workforce will make our current daily lives better. It may

also

be worth noting that the economic effects obtained at work will be semi-permanent as long as society exists.

For instance

, in my country Japan, Japan experienced a bubble economy and still I feel the benefits of economic growth at that time. By way of conclusion, from the examples and ideas above it can be seen that there are valid arguments on

this

debate.

However

, I am of the grand scheme of things, the disadvantages on social with overwork outweigh the benefits in economics. I suppose, companies ought to limit their employee's working hours and strive for public safety.