Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Publishing
politicians
' personal
lives
in bulletins should be restricted
according to
some people. I completely agree because
politicians
not only pose a right to
privacy
but
also
could be dangerous for their relatives. The primary reason for not printing
politicians
' private
lives
in newspapers is the right to
privacy
. If every aspect of their
lives
is exposed in front of everybody, these people may get stressed which may impede their ability to offer public services;
consequently
, they lose the trust of
public
Add an article
the public
show examples
.
For example
, research shows that many
politicians
have resigned from their posts because they fear being exposed to their personal
lives
in front of others.
Hence
, the media should be responsible for making sensible decisions to separate public information from private information. Another reason for maintaining personal confidentiality is the potential danger to their relatives. To justify, their families and friends have to suffer
due to
their
privacy
invasion which is completely unfair to them. In some cases, the relatives of
politicians
are being attacked by some people to express their anger towards the
politicians
, or they receive negative behaviours from others.
For instance
, had the media not leaked the personal information about the bitter relationship between Madhya Pradesh's Chief minister and his son,
this
son would not have left India forever to protect himself from other
politicians
.
Therefore
, publishers should respect their relationships with others;
otherwise
, opponents can use their negative relations for political gain. In conclusion,
due to
the right to
privacy
and to protect personal relations, I believe that the private
lives
of
politicians
should not be published in the newspapers.
Submitted by immysandhu94 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay presents a clear stance on the topic and provides reasons for your position, which is essential for task achievement. However, including more detailed and varied examples would strengthen your argument and make your points more persuasive.
coherence cohesion
Your ideas are generally clear, but some sentences could be structured more effectively to enhance clarity. For instance, instead of 'politicians not only pose a right to privacy,' you might say, 'politicians not only have a right to privacy.'
coherence cohesion
To improve coherence, consider using more linking phrases to create smoother transitions between sentences and paragraphs. This will help the reader follow your argument more easily.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear and logical structure, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. This makes it easy to follow your argument.
task achievement
You effectively introduce your main points in the topic sentences and then provide explanations and examples to support them.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion succinctly summarizes your position and the main reasons for it, which reinforces your argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: