Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Economic development is seemingly achieved at the cost of the

environment

.

This

has led some to propose that

governments

should halt economic growth, but many people posit it as the only panacea for starvation and

poverty

. My stance is that economic advancement is not entirely to blame for environmental problems and that it plays a key role in alleviating world hunger and breaking the vicious circle of

poverty

. Admittedly, there is empirical evidence suggesting how much harm countries thriving economically are doing to the

environment

.

This

can be seen in the disappearance of natural habitats

due to

deforestation, the extinction of many animal species

due to

poaching, and pollution of various kinds

due to

industrial and agricultural waste.

Such

problems,

however

, are fundamentally caused by maladroit

governments

that either overlook the repercussions of their inaction or condone pernicious human activities because of short-term economic incentives.

Thus

, the

environment

could still be protected if

governments

around the world strove for economic sustainability. I am convinced that growth in global wealth is the only way to eradicate hunger and

poverty

. The former problem can be remedied by providing those living in destitute regions with food and shelter, but

this

provision is not financially viable without economic progress.

Furthermore

, a successful economy invariably engenders more job opportunities,

hence

allowing more economically disadvantaged people to feed themselves and their families.

Nevertheless

, the lack of important knowledge areas or employability skills confines poor people to a small number of jobs. In order to holistically curb

this

problem, countries have to allocate more funding to education,

for example

in the form of educational facilities in less well-off

neighborhoods

Change the spelling

neighbourhoods

show examples

and free vocational courses for underemployed and unemployed adults. Again, without sufficient funds,

this

capital allocation is impossible. In conclusion, economic development does not necessarily exclude the protection of the

environment

and vice versa, provided that

governments

rigorously circumscribe detrimental economic activities.

Thus

, the promotion of economic growth should be embraced because it is the only way to tackle starvation and

poverty

.