Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Economic development is seemingly achieved at the cost of the

environment

Use synonyms

.

This

Linking Words

has led some to propose that

governments

Use synonyms

should halt economic growth, but many people posit it as the only panacea for starvation and

poverty

Use synonyms

. My stance is that economic advancement is not entirely to blame for environmental problems and that it plays a key role in alleviating world hunger and breaking the vicious circle of

poverty

Use synonyms

. Admittedly, there is empirical evidence suggesting how much harm countries thriving economically are doing to the

environment

Use synonyms

.

This

Linking Words

can be seen in the disappearance of natural habitats

due to

Linking Words

deforestation, the extinction of many animal species

due to

Linking Words

poaching, and pollution of various kinds

due to

Linking Words

industrial and agricultural waste.

Such

Linking Words

problems,

however

Linking Words

, are fundamentally caused by maladroit

governments

Use synonyms

that either overlook the repercussions of their inaction or condone pernicious human activities because of short-term economic incentives.

Thus

Linking Words

, the

environment

Use synonyms

could still be protected if

governments

Use synonyms

around the world strove for economic sustainability. I am convinced that growth in global wealth is the only way to eradicate hunger and

poverty

Use synonyms

. The former problem can be remedied by providing those living in destitute regions with food and shelter, but

this

Linking Words

provision is not financially viable without economic progress.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, a successful economy invariably engenders more job opportunities,

hence

Linking Words

allowing more economically disadvantaged people to feed themselves and their families.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, the lack of important knowledge areas or employability skills confines poor people to a small number of jobs. In order to holistically curb

this

Linking Words

problem, countries have to allocate more funding to education,

for example

Linking Words

in the form of educational facilities in less well-off

neighborhoods

Change the spelling

neighbourhoods

show examples

and free vocational courses for underemployed and unemployed adults. Again, without sufficient funds,

this

Linking Words

capital allocation is impossible. In conclusion, economic development does not necessarily exclude the protection of the

environment

Use synonyms

and vice versa, provided that

governments

Use synonyms

rigorously circumscribe detrimental economic activities.

Thus

Linking Words

, the promotion of economic growth should be embraced because it is the only way to tackle starvation and

poverty

Use synonyms

.