Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Economic development is seemingly achieved at the cost of the
environment
. This
has led some to propose that governments
should halt economic growth, but many people posit it as the only panacea for starvation and poverty
. My stance is that economic advancement is not entirely to blame for environmental problems and that it plays a key role in alleviating world hunger and breaking the vicious circle of poverty
.
Admittedly, there is empirical evidence suggesting how much harm countries thriving economically are doing to the environment
. This
can be seen in the disappearance of natural habitats due to
deforestation, the extinction of many animal species due to
poaching, and pollution of various kinds due to
industrial and agricultural waste. Such
problems, however
, are fundamentally caused by maladroit governments
that either overlook the repercussions of their inaction or condone pernicious human activities because of short-term economic incentives. Thus
, the environment
could still be protected if governments
around the world strove for economic sustainability.
I am convinced that growth in global wealth is the only way to eradicate hunger and poverty
. The former problem can be remedied by providing those living in destitute regions with food and shelter, but this
provision is not financially viable without economic progress. Furthermore
, a successful economy invariably engenders more job opportunities, hence
allowing more economically disadvantaged people to feed themselves and their families. Nevertheless
, the lack of important knowledge areas or employability skills confines poor people to a small number of jobs. In order to holistically curb this
problem, countries have to allocate more funding to education, for example
in the form of educational facilities in less well-off neighborhoods
and free vocational courses for underemployed and unemployed adults. Again, without sufficient funds, Change the spelling
neighbourhoods
this
capital allocation is impossible.
In conclusion, economic development does not necessarily exclude the protection of the environment
and vice versa, provided that governments
rigorously circumscribe detrimental economic activities. Thus
, the promotion of economic growth should be embraced because it is the only way to tackle starvation and poverty
.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a well-organized structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, ensure a slightly more balanced discussion by providing more details on how economic sustainability can be achieved alongside environmental protection.
coherence cohesion
Good use of coherent arguments to support your stance. Consider using more transition words or phrases to enhance the flow between paragraphs and ideas
task achievement
Be mindful of adding more diverse examples and data to solidify your points further and make your arguments a little more persuasive.
task achievement
The essay clearly addresses all parts of the task, including discussion of both views and providing a well-justified opinion.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are both strong, effectively setting the scene and summarizing your stance.
task achievement
Main points are well-developed and supported with relevant explanations, showcasing your understanding of the topic.