Some people think that the increase in international travel has a negative impact on the environment and should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Over the years, governing bodies have continuously passed bills to restrict international travel as it is detrimental to the environment. Developing countries are strongly against

this

idea because 70% of their income is derived from the influx of foreign visitors,

whereas

developed countries support the government’s decision.

This

essay completely agrees with the stance of the advanced countries. I believe that foreign trips are hazardous to the climate and that tourists tend to act inhumanely in new societies.

To begin

with, travelling abroad is mostly done by aeroplanes or trains, which are known to produce substantial amounts of carbon monoxide (CO).

This

gaseous substance is undoubtedly deadly to both humans and plants.

For instance

, in 2002, the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria stated that

due to

the excess number of planes

flown

Change the form of the verb

flying

show examples

into the country, humans are more likely to die from air pollution than from smoking cigarettes.

Therefore

, authorities should reduce flights for personal purposes and limit them to strictly commercial use.

Furthermore

, when people visit a new country, it is usually to learn about the place;

however

, recently, travellers have been seen to cause more environmental havoc,

such

as throwing litter on the streets.

For example

, every December, Lagos is a popular state visited to the extent that going there yearly is nicknamed “Detty December.” People go to the beach and dispose of plastic into the sea,

hence

, exposing aquatic animals to danger.

To sum up

, I wholeheartedly commend the notion of regulating outbound journeys.

This

approach not only improves the atmosphere but

also

creates a cleaner surrounding.