Over the years, governing bodies have continuously passed bills to restrict international travel as it is detrimental to the environment. Developing countries are strongly against
this
idea because 70% of their income is derived from the influx of foreign visitors, Linking Words
whereas
developed countries support the government’s decision. Linking Words
This
essay completely agrees with the stance of the advanced countries. I believe that foreign trips are hazardous to the climate and that tourists tend to act inhumanely in new societies.
Linking Words
To begin
with, travelling abroad is mostly done by aeroplanes or trains, which are known to produce substantial amounts of carbon monoxide (CO). Linking Words
This
gaseous substance is undoubtedly deadly to both humans and plants. Linking Words
For instance
, in 2002, the Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria stated that Linking Words
due to
the excess number of planes Linking Words
flown
into the country, humans are more likely to die from air pollution than from smoking cigarettes. Change the form of the verb
flying
Therefore
, authorities should reduce flights for personal purposes and limit them to strictly commercial use.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, when people visit a new country, it is usually to learn about the place; Linking Words
however
, recently, travellers have been seen to cause more environmental havoc, Linking Words
such
as throwing litter on the streets. Linking Words
For example
, every December, Lagos is a popular state visited to the extent that going there yearly is nicknamed “Detty December.” People go to the beach and dispose of plastic into the sea, Linking Words
hence
, exposing aquatic animals to danger.
Linking Words
To sum up
, I wholeheartedly commend the notion of regulating outbound journeys. Linking Words
This
approach not only improves the atmosphere but Linking Words
also
creates a cleaner surrounding.Linking Words
adebimpeanimawun