Some people think that people who have committed crimes should do unpaid community work such as helping a charity or cleaning the streets, rather than spending time in prison. Do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals propose that some
criminals
can do community work for free as a way of punishment instead
of being in prison. I strongly agree with this
method because it has advantages for both criminals
themselves and charity
organizations
.
On the one hand, criminals
can have a happy life by working for charity
organizations
. This
is mainly because they will gain a sense of fulfilment and achievement through helping others, especially when they are helping disabled children with their daily care. They may be touched by children’s braveness to overcome disabilities so that they will be inspired to move on their remaining lives back to the majority society. For instance
, if one of these criminals
has a natural instinct for teaching these disabled children, the person would pursue a career as a teacher once his or her punishment is over.
On the other hand
, charity
organizations
will be beneficial because of the criminals
’ free work. Criminals
who are paid for nothing can provide free labour for charity
organizations
which usually have limited funds. As a result
, these institutions can use this
free labour to deliver piles of food to poor communities and train these special caregivers to look after the elderly or disabled. For instance
, if an enthusiastic young organizer who has no money has a kind of will to help others, the young organizer could lead a group of these
special caregivers to solve the vulnerable communities’ problems.
In conclusion, their participation in community services is a considerably good idea. Correct determiner usage
apply
However
, some severe criminals
such
as murderers should not be permitted to participate in unpaid community work.Submitted by shaobo.xu on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay provides a complete response to the task prompt, clearly expressing agreement with the idea of having criminals perform community work instead of serving time in prison. However, expand slightly more on why severe criminals should not be included in this scheme to make the argument more comprehensive.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea to improve clarity. Although the ideas are clear and explained well, consider using more varied linking phrases to enhance the flow and connection between ideas.
task achievement
Great use of specific examples to support your points, which enhances the essay's overall persuasiveness. The scenario of criminals helping disabled children and pursuing teaching careers is particularly strong.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are both present and effectively frame the essay. The conclusion, in particular, neatly reinforces your main points and introduces the idea that severe criminals should be treated differently.
coherence cohesion
The essay is logically structured, with each body paragraph focusing on how the proposed solution benefits different parties.