Some people think it is more important to spend money on road and motorways rather than on public transport systems such as railways and trams.

In today’s world, it is a common belief that expanding money on making streets and highways is more advantageous than public transit. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the idea that it is necessary to spend on roads and motorways because it causes pollution and wastes a myriad of money. It is vital to understand that building some new highways will lead to the destruction of natural habitats.

Due to

the fact that the more streets are opened, the more vehicles will be used, resulting in a level of emission that will cause air pollution. Take an example in HCM city, where the motorway system is expanded everywhere,

whereas

public transport

such

as train stations or underground rarely developed.

This

gives rise to greenhouses, not only that, but people can get diseases when get out of their houses.

Therefore

, if people have just used to shipment by road, the environment will have been polluted and led to climate change. I believe that spending on developing public transportation is a good way to save the finances. Because the cost of a car or motorbike is more expensive than a ticket train,

this

needs to be used for emergency situations.

For instance

, Japan is known as a country

that is

very developed in underground and railway systems, as they always choose trains or trams to go to work rather than vehicles, thanks to the convenience, suitable prices and friendly environment.

Additionally

, investing in public transportation systems can reduce traffic tram and many accidents. In conclusion, my view is that expenditures on roads and motorways are more disadvantageous

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because focusing on developing public services can help people save money and protect the environment.